March 31, 2017
What? I thought Trump was supposed to be delusional to think he was being spied on?
We’re starting to hit levels of fake news that shouldn’t even be possible here, folks.
The Jews at the New York Times are trying to weasel out of this situation where they reported themselves that Trump had been wiretapped back in January, before Trump made his famous claim.
Now everyone is looking back at their reporting and calling them out on it.
This is the original article.
American law enforcement and intelligence agencies are examining intercepted communications and financial transactions as part of a broad investigation into possible links between Russian officials and associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump, including his former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, current and former senior American officials said.
It is not clear whether the intercepted communications had anything to do with Mr. Trump’s campaign, or Mr. Trump himself. It is also unclear whether the inquiry has anything to do with an investigation into the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s computers and other attempts to disrupt the elections in November. The American government has concluded that the Russian government was responsible for a broad computer hacking campaign, including the operation against the D.N.C.
At the very bottom is the notice, in very small print:
“Wiretapped Data,” huh?
Of course, this was when the NYT was doing everything in it’s power to push the Russian hacking narrative, so they weren’t worried about revealing that some of the Trump team’s communications had been under surveillance.
But now, they have a new fake news angle to defend, and must explain away their previous coverage.
When I want facts checked, the Jew York Times is my go-to source.
Mr. Trump repeatedly referred to the article as proof for his claim.
“On front page of The New York Times, OK? It’s in the title of the front page. And I would like you to officially — I know you are going to write a bad article because you always do —[mention] wiretap data used in inquiry of Trump aides.”
This is misleading. Neither the print nor online version of the article supports Mr. Trump’s accusation that Mr. Obama ordered surveillance on him.
The Times reported that there were intercepted conversations involving Mr. Trump’s associates, but it did not report that they or Mr. Trump were the subject of wiretap orders. To date, The Times has not found evidence of that.
Basically, they’re trying to say that since they never reported that Obama directly ordered Trump to be wiretapped, that their reporting has nothing to do with Trump’s claims.
No wonder Jews are often compared to hissing weasels.
Weasels are the Jew’s spirit animals – along with rats and snakes.
It obviously makes no difference if Obama personally ordered the spying – his government did it, so he’s responsible for it.
Also, who would believe that his campaign staff was spied on, but Trump wasn’t?
This is just Jewish gibberish.
The rest of their “fact check” is along the same lines, splitting hairs and playing with word definitions.
But even other journalists are calling them out on their dishonesty.
As I’ve written before, back on Jan. 20 the Times carried a front-page story with the headline: “Wiretapped Data Used in Inquiry of Trump Aides.”
There were four bylines on the story, which means that four different reporters — not to mention multiple editors — must have known the source of the information about Trump’s aides being spied upon.
The story read, in part: “American law enforcement and intelligence agencies are examining intercepted communications and financial transactions as part of a broad investigation into possible links between Russian officials and associates of President-elect Donald J. Trump.”
So, if that reporting was correct, the Times knew that some people associated with Trump were being wiretapped or — possibly — had been mentioned in wiretaps of foreign governments.
The Jew’s denials and justifications are transparently dishonest. They’re making no attempt to maintain an air of neutrality or fair reporting.
And this was planned.
The second thing is another warning from me that the Democrats should be careful. I mentioned before the election that the Democrats were walking into an ambush by nominating Hillary. I think the same thing is happening with this Russian investigation — Trump’s claims about his office being wiretapped probably won’t be totally proven but, as Nunes indicated, some lesser level of espionage is likely to have happened.
So, again, the Democrats are walking into a trap.
This is the same trap that already has the Times and most of the other so-called mainstream media ensnared.
Here’s a thought experiment.
Imagine Trump, from the beginning, knew about Clinton’s Russia ties, about Podesta’s corruption, about the illegal spying, everything.
Imagine he came out with the whole thing at once. Since it came out of nowhere, it wouldn’t be widely believed, since it’s so extreme.
What’s happening instead, is that he’s waiting for the media (as well as the Democrats and cuckservatives) to slowly entrap themselves.
They openly discussed him being spied on in order to “prove” he has Russian ties. He lets everyone scream about how bad Russian ties, so that the people learn to associate it with “crime” and “corruption.”
Then he made the claim that Obama spied on him, and now they have to backtrack their previous claims to continue attacking him, even if they know they’re lying.
Finally, he helps in revealing that Podesta and Clinton received huge amounts of money from Russian interests and returned the favor in very significant ways.
His enemies are now in a position where they have to simultaneously claim that he was spied on and not spied on, and that Russian ties are a grave concern and also irrelevant.
Trump is the Mike Tyson of multi-dimensional chess.
The jig is up, Jews.