Mainstream Media Names FBI Informant Who Invaded Trump Campaign a Week After Alex Jones Broke Story

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
May 20, 2018

So, Alex Jones recorded this interview with Roger Stone a week ago, outing Stefan Halper as the FBI agent who infiltrated the Trump campaign on behalf of the Obama/Clinton/Comey/Jew (general) conspiracy.

The media refused to confirm his identity until Saturday.

New York Post:

A Cambridge professor with deep ties to American and British intelligence has been outed as an agent who snooped on the Trump presidential campaign for the FBI.

Multiple media outlets have named Stefan Halper, 73, as the secret informant who met with Trump campaign advisers Carter Page and George Papadopoulos starting in the summer of 2016. The American-born academic previously served in the Nixon, Ford and Reagan administrations.

The revelation, stemming from recent reports in which FBI sources admitted sending an agent to snoop on the Trump camp, heightens suspicions that the FBI was seeking to entrap Trump campaign aides. Papodopoulous has pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, while Page was the subject of a federal surveillance warrant.

“If the FBI or DOJ was infiltrating a campaign for the benefit of another campaign, that is a really big deal,” President Trump tweeted Saturday, calling for the FBI to release additional documents to Congress.

The Halper revelation also shows the Obama administration’s FBI began prying into the opposing party’s presidential nominee earlier than it previously admitted.

Jones is not being given credit by the media for breaking the story.

They’re claiming Fox and NBC “connected the dots” based on WaPo and NYT reports.

Actually, they just watched the dot-connector himself in action on his YouTube channel.

But you know who really deserves credit here?


Because at least 50% of what Alex Jones says is bullshit or exaggerations. Like when he said 10,000 people a year drown in swimming pools and it’s actually only 3,500.

I was able to detect the truth of the Stone claim that it was Halper, and report it to you, the reader of the world’s most accurate news site.

We get a lot of press for being the most genocidal website, and the most censored, but we are rarely acknowledged as the most accurate.

Seriously, not even messing with you here – name a single website that has a better track record for absolute accuracy than this one. There is not one. If I stopped saying “nigger” and “kike” so much, and calling for all of these exterminations of entire races of humans and dogs, I would get a Pulitzer.

Anyway, I don’t self-congratulate much, but surely I have a right to every once in a while.

There is other interesting information on Halper in the NYP article (which is summarizing reports from other sources – I don’t think the post does original reporting).

It is not clear if the professor was paid to speak with Trump campaign figures, but public records show that he has received large payments from the federal government in the last two years.

The Department of Defense’s Office of Net Assessment — a shadowy think tank that reports directly to the secretary of defense — paid Halper $282,000 in 2016 and $129,000 in 2017.

Halper has close personal and professional ties to the CIA reaching back decades. He is the son-in-law of a former deputy director of the agency and worked on the 1980 presidential campaign of George H.W. Bush, who had served as CIA director.

When Bush became Ronald Reagan’s running mate, Halper was implicated in a spying scandal in which CIA officials gave inside information on the Carter administration to the GOP campaign.


This guy is a CIA asset, primarily.

Either he was on loan from the CIA to the FBI, or he was working for the CIA on this particular operation and the information was merely shared with the FBI.

Which is certainly interesting.

Thus far, the focus has been on the Obama Administration and the FBI – but the conspiracy obviously goes deeper than that. And this is our first glance into the next level of the conspiracy to thwart Donald Trump.

How deep does this go? 

Also, I am still maintaining that PROBABLY Carter Page – one of the people Halper met with, in fact – is himself a spook.

He sure as hell looks like one.

We had been talking about him being an FBI agent, but it would make a lot more sense if he was a CIA agent, given his apparent investigation into Russia (which is being framed as the opposite of that by the media).

He was a volunteer for the Trump campaign. In the actual campaign. Which is something different than what went on with Halper, where he was just meeting with people apparently casually for reasons that don’t even seem to make sense. All three of the people he spoke to have said that he didn’t appear to be prodding them in any way, he just met them for casual discussions. So what then was the point of it, if that is indeed all that happened?

Also, we’ve been talking about a “mole,” and what Halper did does not fit that definition. This was just casual espionage – which served no clear purpose.

What I am imagining is that it is possible that with all this “mole” talk going on, they are throwing Halper out there as a decoy to distract from an actual mole, who I suspect was Carter Page.

I don’t know that, of course, and am not asserting that as fact. It is simply my estimation that it is very likely the case.

Join the discussion at The Goyim Know BBS