Jewish Mark Zuckerberg Purposefully Blocked Pro-Life Material Ahead of Abortion Vote

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
July 12, 2019

So these tech companies are just openly and shamelessly manipulating society in order to push a radical Jewish political agenda.

And it keeps getting reported in the news, but everyone is just kinda like “oh yes, you’ll have that.”

LifeSiteNews:

During a recent speech, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitted that the social media company chose to block American pro-life groups from running ads on Ireland’s abortion referendum last year despite being under no legal obligation to do so.

Zuckerberg was speaking to the annual Aspen Ideas Festival. In a video clip highlighted by Live Action founder Lila Rose, Zuckerberg cites the company’s experience with the May 2018 referendum to repeal Ireland’s constitutional protection for preborn babies as an example of why countries need clearer laws on the permissibility of foreign advertising on political decisions.

“During that election, leading up to that referendum, a bunch of pro-life American groups advertised in this Irish, leading up to this Irish election, to try to influence public opinion there,” Zuckerberg said. “And we went to the Irish, and asked folks there, ‘how do you want us to handle this? You have no laws on the books that are relevant for whether we should be allowing this kind of speech in your election, and really this doesn’t feel like the kind of thing that a private company should be making a decision on.’”

He says Irish officials told them at the time that “we don’t currently have a law, so you need to make whatever decision you want to make.” However, despite the fact that the Irish government themselves didn’t consider American pro-life ads to be impermissible “election interference,” Zuckerberg revealed that “we ended up not allowing the ads.”

Yes, there are no laws about any of it.

What doesn’t seem to be a part of the conversation is that not making a law in order to make a thing to happen is not any different than making a law to make a thing happen.

Like, if people were being murdered in the streets, and the government refused to pass a law banning murder, then the government would be facilitating murder.

We live in a society with a government that is charged with making laws.

Top Comments

  1. They’re private companies, goyim. They can do as they like. Libertarianism is more important than the Constitution. It’s what the Founding Fathers said.

  2. It’s true because IFLScience®. The founders knew that power concentrated in the hands of a few people in government was evil. But power concentrated in the hands of a few people in a global corporation was totally fine.

    Limited government is Who We Are, which is why our government is so small and constrained. But businesses should be allowed to do whatever they want because I’m carrying an invisible knapsack of white privilege.

  3. "…and really this doesn’t feel like the kind of thing that a private company should be making a decision on.’”

    The utter hypocrisy is astounding.

  4. Facebook is the propaganda agency of the occupied government, so we aren’t going to see any regulation.

    I doubt Zuck even runs the show over there anyway. He’s a frontman to push the meme that anyone can become a billionaire.

  5. Be a publicly-traded company named Facebook

    Derive 100% of your revenue from ad sales

    Turn down paying advertising business, even after being explicitly told by local authorities there is no legal reason to do so

    This is called “Breach of Fiduciary Responsibility to Shareholders” and is legally actionable by anybody owning at least one share of Facebook stock.

  6. Oh yeah, and this:

    Zuckerberg revealed that “we ended up not allowing the ads.”

    Just, you know, it ended up that way, kinda like the way things end up sometimes.

  7. “While National Socialism brought about a new version and formulation of European culture, Bolshevism is the declaration of war by Jewish-led international subhumans against culture itself. It is not only anti-bourgeois, it is anti-cultural. It means, in the final consequence, the absolute destruction of all economic, social, state, cultural, and civilizing advances made by western civilization for the benefit of a rootless and nomadic international clique of conspirators, who have found their representation in Jewry.” -Goebbels, 1935

    Zuckerburg and his big tech cronies in a nutshell.

  8. No one’s responsible, goy.

    These happenings are most certainly NOT the results of decisions made by actual people in power. They are, rather, the natural outcomes of inexorable forces of mass humanity operating in the world. Don’t you read the Economist?

    What’s that? Why does one tiny enthno-religious minority always seem to benefit from these inexorable global forces at the expense of the rest of the population? That’s the kind of question only a crazy, violent Nazi would ask. You’re a dangerous Nazi on the wrong side of history. Your speech is violence. Die.

  9. Why are Jews proponents for killing living human fetuses. They are god’s chosen people? What kind of a god desires/permits this? Very, very strange.

  10. The one with the horns.

Join the discussion TGKBBS

5 more replies

Participants