November 5, 2013
Every time a highly publicized shooting incident happens in this country, you can bet that Democratic California Senator Dianne Feinstein will be right there to call for increased gun control more than you can safely bet on the day’s weather forecast.
Even though LAX airport was already considered a “gun-free zone” (aside from roving police patrols curiously removed from checkpoints for reasons unknown in the months leading up to the recent shooting), that didn’t stop Senator Feinstein from going on CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday to say she’d introduce another bill over it.
The California Democrat said, “the weapon was a .223 MP-15, where the MP stands for military and police, clearly designed not for general consumption … Same gun that was used at Aurora. Would I do a bill? Sure, I would do a bill. I mean, I believe this down deep in my soul.”
But Feinstein said that such a bill would be very difficult to pass. “There’s a hammer lock on the Congress by the gun owners and gun people,” she said.
“Gun people”? Does she mean people who assert their Second Amendment right, one of the founding principles of this country written into the Constitution she swore an oath on when she took her position in Congress?
Feinstein already introduced a bill called the Assault Weapons Ban of 2013 earlier this year, but it has since stalled out.
Remember, this is the same person who wants to strip independent journalists of their First Amendment and limit protections only to those she deems “real reporters” (read: mainstream media establishment puppets).
Never mind that law-abiding citizens aren’t the ones perpetrating gun crimes. If laws stopped crimes, there would be no crimes.
Congress’ approval rating is hovering around a pitiful 10%. People are more afraid of the government than they are of terrorists.
While the suspected LAX shooter has quickly been labeled a conspiracy theorist with strong anti-government views, in the crazy times we’re living in, that’s really not even saying a whole lot anymore. The claim is 23-year-old Paul Ciancia went to the airport specifically with intent to kill Transportation Security Administration officials and even had a note in his bag about wanting to “kill TSA”.
In fact, the whole story seems completely bunk to many who follow alternative media and are paying attention, people who are sick and tired of the never ending police state being erecting all around us… and here’s why.
Why would someone with anti-government views who dislikes TSA that much purposely commit a violent crime against them that would only serve to strengthen the very same TSA and government he is so against?
To do so will only be used as a new excuse by the government to give said TSA EVEN MORE POWER.
In a matter of mere days, we’ve seen this predictable response already. Look at Feinstein already calling for a new gun bill. Look at the fact that the Department of Homeland Security had already ordered over 3 million training bullets for the TSA officers back in August (and the shooting death of a TSA for the first time in the agency’s 12-year history is a perfect excuse to hasten that training). Look at the fact that any time something like this happens and it’s exploited all over the mainstream media, ultimately it is only used as an excuse to try drive the point home that we need to have more of our rights taken away.
They might arm the TSA, but they won’t let Americans exercise their Second Amendment rights at an airport. No way. This shooting will only give the government more power, and ultimately, more control over the people. That’s how these things work.
So it really doesn’t even make any sense in any way for someone who doesn’t like the TSA to shoot up an airport.
Anyone paying attention who is truly against what this tyrannical, runaway government is doing to centralize power and enslave its citizens — you know, someone who isn’t a false flag patsy — well, that person would know that.