The New Observer
May 1, 2016
Jews have been at the “heart” of Britain’s far left Labour Party and “progressive politics” in Britain for 100 years, party leader Jeremy Corbyn has announced, and therefore it cannot be “anti-Semitic.”
Ironically, the current “controversy” in the Labour Party is the inevitable result of its policies of promoting mass Third World immigration—which has led to a rise in nonwhite membership sympathetic to the plight of the Palestinians.
Corbyn leading a London protest against Israel’s war crimes in Gaza. Note the large number of nonwhite faces in the crowd, all the product of the establishment-promoted policies of mass Third World immigration.
The Labour leader said his party is “anti-racist” and “has a long and proud history of standing against racism, including anti-Semitism.”
He added: “I have campaigned against racism all my life and the Jewish community has been at the heart of the Labour party and progressive politics in Britain for more than 100 years.”
It is the important distinction between being “anti-Semitic” and being “anti-Zionist” which is now exploited by the Jewish-controlled mass media to claim that the Labour Party is “anti-Semitic.”
The true far left—as opposed to the Jewish lobby fake far left—is indeed opposed to Israel’s proven brutality, mass murder, terrorism, and violent suppression of the Palestinians after the latter people’s land was seized to create the state of Israel.
The far left’s opposition to Israel’s policies is a completely separate issue to “anti-Semitism”—but the Jewish lobby always portrays anti-Zionism as another form of “anti-Semitism” and in that way seeks to divert criticism of Israel’s policies.
This is nowhere more apparent than in the current coverage being given to claims of “anti-Semitism” in the UK’s Labour Party.
In reality, all that far leftists like Ken Livingstone have done is consistently apply their policy of “non-racism” to Israel as well.
The Jews—being at the “heart” of the Labour Party, as Corbyn said, had always previously demanded that everyone else be “non-racist”—but consistently ignored the fact that Israel is the state with the most racially-based laws in the world, eclipsing Nazi Germany in its demands for separation from Gentiles, and Apartheid South Africa in the extent of its racial segregation.
This Jewish lobby duplicity and hypocrisy have effectively been kept under wraps by the Jewish-controlled mass media for decades—but now with the advent of the Internet, their stranglehold on news and information has been sabotaged.
In addition, the Jewish lobby’s promotion of the policies of mass Third World immigration has led to a large nonwhite resident population in Britain and most Western nations.
These nonwhites—now numbering in the millions—are almost all supporters of the far left parties, and also of the Palestinian cause.
This in turn has created the situation where, for example, senior UK Labour Party officials have demanded that the policy of “non-racism” also be applied to Israel.
It is this demand for consistency which is now being portrayed as “anti-Semitic.”
It is this demand for consistency—to judge the Jewish state by the same standards that the Jews judge all Gentile states—that is now the cause of the screams of “anti-Semitism.”
Earlier, Labour Party Member of Parliament Naz Shah—herself a product of the Jewish lobby promotion of mass Third World immigration—was suspended from the party after social media posts emerged of her endorsing the relocation of Israel to the US as a way of ending the oppression of the Palestinians.
In a Facebook post, Shah shared a graphic which showed an image of Israel’s outline superimposed onto a map of the US under the headline “Solution for Israel-Palestine Conflict—Relocate Israel into United States,” with the comment “problem solved.”
This post is not “anti-Semitic” in any way—but that, of course, is not how the controlled media has spun it. Shah’s “crime” is not being “anti-Semitic,” but simply asking for the Jewish suppression of the Palestinians to stop.
None of these facts make any difference to the Jewish lobby, which is now on a witch hunt within the Labour Party to hunt down and expel anyone who is critical of Israel—by labelling them as “anti-Semitic.”
Already, one of the Labour Party’s largest donors, the Jewish “property developer” David Abrahams, has announced that he has withdrawn his support from that party “since he didn’t believe the party leadership was doing enough to tackle hate.”
Another major Jewish donor, “businessman” Michael Foster, also withdrew his support from the Labour Party, saying that Jews “were turning their back on the party, which, at its top levels, appears by its inaction to tolerate anti-Semitic speech and behavior.”
Writing in the Mail on Sunday, Foster said Corbyn “makes no attempt at all to put at ease a Jewish community in Britain that for more than 100 years has supported Labour spiritually, politically, and financially.”
Foster, who described himself as a “committed socialist,” said that Corbyn was “too weak to stand up against the wing of the party on whose support he relies. These people have a Pavlovian reaction to Jews and Israel: see a Jew, see an anti-Palestinian.”
“They blend Israel and Zionism into the supposed demagoguery of the classic Jew, an all-controlling malevolent demon, and a rich one, intent on committing incremental genocide against the Palestinian people.”
Foster said that Jewish supporters had given “almost one-third of the £9.7 million that Labour received from private donors” in the run-up to the 2015 general election.
“This year, no major Jewish donor has yet given one pound to the central Labour Party. It is, in its way, a tragedy,” he said.
It is therefore ironic—like Dr. Frankenstein being murdered by the monster he created—that the Jewish lobby’s own policies of mass Third World immigration has helped create the large leftist group which vociferously opposes the Jews’ suppression of the Palestinians.
Now, the Jewish lobby is left with no option but to try to use the “anti-Semitic” canard to cover up their own double standards and hypocrisy.