November 14, 2017
This is your history on Judaism.
The progressive state of California is taking a bold step to eradicate hate by creating a new, more inclusive historical curriculum. This is a response to the perceived abundance of disgust against so-called “faggots” within the Golden State.
Educational experts have examined the history program for children and found it wanting. As such, a comprehensive effort to “fag it up” is being undertaken. The problem is that a large-scale conspiracy exists to hide the proven historical fact that all major figures are actually homosexuals, and that buggery is the engine of world history.
It is believed that once children are informed of the importance that masturbating in other men’s anuses has had in the founding and development of America, they’ll finally stop hating sex perverts.
California has become the first state to approve LGBT-inclusive history textbooks for use in primary schools, the Advocate reports.
The California State Board of Education on Thursday approved 10 textbooks for kindergarten through eighth-grade students that include coverage of the historical contributions of LGBT people, and rejected two that failed to include such coverage.
The rejected textbooks failed to abide by California’s 2011 FAIR Education Act. The law, written by former state Sen. Mark Leno, requires that schools teach about historical figures who were LGBT or who had disabilities.
Joseph Goebbels had a disability. They should definitely do a chapter on his life and struggle.
Most badass cripple ever?
Equality California’s executive director, Rick Zbur, called the board’s decision a “long-fought victory.”
“Approval of these textbooks means that California schools will now have access to approved materials that accurately represent LGBTQ people, and Equality California applauds the State Board of Education for this historic decision,” Zbur said.
“Accurately represent LGBTQ people.”
In order to give students the full representation of the reality of homosexuality, they should watch this famous documentary:
The two books that didn’t make the cut were published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, according to the website EdSource.
The textbooks were rejected because they failed to address the sexual orientations of historical figures who were LGBT, or widely speculated by historians to have been LGBT. They include poets Emily Dickinson and Walt Whitman, authors Ralph Waldo Emerson and Nathaniel Hawthorne, and President James Buchanan.
So now just because some Jew historians “speculate” that someone may have been a homo, this needs to immediately become the official history taught to children.
And these people will accuse famous figures of being faggots over the flimsiest excuses. For example, Alexander the great is said to have been homosexual because he famously had a close male friend. So in their minds, having close friends = being a faggot.
“Looks like two straight up faggots to me.” -Jew historians
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt said that LGBT people are “central to both United States history and culture,” but declined to make some of the changes suggested by a state-appointed commission to review the textbooks.
“HMH feels that the terms lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer are contemporary terms that may not map well on past lives and experiences,” the publisher said in response to the commission.
The reality is that the modern concept of “homosexuality,” never mind these other nonsense terms, has no historical analogue. While there’s probably always been degenerates buggering each other, the idea of men defining their identity based on this behavior and claiming that it’s normal and healthy is unprecedented.
Applying this label to historical figures is as ridiculous as claiming that Julius Caesar was a “Nazi” or that cavemen were anarcho-syndicalists.
But the point of this new curriculum, of course, isn’t to be more historically accurate. The point is to retro-actively normalize the pathologies of the modern world in order to prevent children from thinking that things could ever be any different from how they are now. It’s pure, politically motivated historical revisionism.