Carl of Swindon Wastes Half an Hour Debating Obese White Slag; Doesn’t Rape Her

Roy Batty
Daily Stormer
April 23, 2019

Sargon of Akkad pictured beating a woman he is preparing to rape at a recent political rally.

UKIP candidate Sargon of Akkad was running on a platform of raping slags into submission.

However, I watched all 30 minutes of Carl getting berated by this irate old slag and not once did he give her a bit of the ol’ in-out, in-out to shut her up.

This is contrary to what I was promised by Carl and I am considering retracting my vote.

Getting yelled at by a fat chick with an annoying accent is bad optics. 

It’s one thing to have a dumb bimbo come by, shriek a few things and flash the camera with her tits.

That’s great optics.

But no man can watch this video of Sargon be berated like a little bitch without cringing.

It reminds us all of “discussions” we’ve had with insane women in our lives that we wish we were never forced to have. Nagging mothers, nagging girlfriends, nagging wives, and nagging female bosses. All of them just bags of hormones and emotional wrecks.

None of these debates and arguments and discussions should ever even come to pass. 

There is literally no reason to ever debate a woman. First and foremost, scientists all agree that women have smaller brains and no dick which means they don’t understand what logic is and so, by any definition, you cannot “debate” them, you can only discipline them or get nagged to death by them.

Regardless of his pro-rape stance, Sargon seems to have failed to internalize this eternal truth. 

Which is strange, considering how powerful his raw intellect is.

In the video, he was trying to do the Crowder-style “debate me at this table” thing as a campaign stunt for his run for office in the district of Swindon, and while I commend his energy and willingness to put himself out there, it was cringy, and a sane man can only listen to a fat cunt slag off for so long before not raping her.

Near the end of the debate, Carl gets the fat bitch to admit that she’s for discrimination against White people because Brown people deserve their turn at the special treatment trough. That really should have been the end of the debate right there, because his point had been proved, but it wasn’t. Carl went on to call her a Nazi and apologized for the central plank in his campaign platform: raping mouthy slags into submission.

The rest of the UKIP platform still holds strong tho:

A man came up to debate Carl afterward. They had a very amicable and civilized (if boring) chat. Carl didn’t have to threaten this man with rape to get him to behave.

Although, I personally would have hired a nigger to rape that man raw the minute that he said, “oh, you mean those Polish rape gangs?” when Carl brought up Rotherham and the grooming gangs all over the UK.

The Eternal Anglo’s first impulse is to just always, always, always blame the Slavs, isn’t it?

Anyways.

Once we get these bitches out of the public square, we can go back to having civilized debates and come to reasonable solutions to our problems.

But not before. 

Top Comments

  1. They won’t see the inside of 10 Downing Street because of this

    electoral corruption compressed.jpg

    Sven Longshanks has done a podcast on UKIP candidate Sargon of Akkad.

  2. Those 2015 election stats are fucking shocking, no matter how many times I see them. Scottish ‘National’ Party got 56 seats with 1,454,436 votes, UKIP got ONE seat with 3,881,129 votes. Let that sink in. Our votes are basically pointless.

    This was why so many turned out to vote for the Referendum on Leaving the EU, as it was a simple majority wins vote, no bullshit, yet still they just ignore it!

    Thanks for the link to Sven Longshanks’ podcast, will listen later.

  3. Don’t really agree much with Sargon on a lot of issues but he’s stirring shit up in the UK and I can support that. Also, her voice was annoying as fuck, and she was honestly rude and obnoxious. In a normal society she’d have gotten a slap across the face and told to shut up.

  4. Has Sargon clarified his position on whether beatings should take place before or after rape?

  5. “Carl of Swindon”

    I can’t stop laughing.

  6. Yeah, no shit. All central banks, television, press, porn … etc are just infested with Slavs.

  7. I just came here for the completely random assortment of memes in this post.

    I was not disappointed.

  8. I am on the fence. Overall I support election reform as it might get some far right politicians on parliament. But in Canada it will have no such effect and just get more shitlib parties like the greens more seats. It is like putting a bandaid on an amputation. We need protected free speech. We need a voice.

  9. A bit of the old ultraviolence would have been even more effective…

    “I think feminism is terrible. I think that it defines women as victims --and I don’t believe that women are victims.”

    “It doesn’t define women as victims!”

    “Of course it does.”

    “In what way does it define them as victims!?”

    “Well, in what way does feminism have any legitimacy if women are not being oppressed by men?”

    [Blank stare] “What do you mean?”

    “Well how is feminism legitimate if women are not being oppressed by men?”

    “Women ARE oppressed by men!”

    –Feminism doesn’t define women as victims, but
    –Feminism requires that we view women as “oppressed.”

    OK, stopped after that. Took her exactly 3 minutes to prove your point:

    She completely contradicts herself in the space of about 30 seconds… and doesn’t realize it, of course. This is not a difficult concept – the oppressor-victim trope is the very basis of intersectionality. If feminism defines women as “oppressed,” and men as the “oppressors,” then it defines women as the _____.

    She starts off whining about his earlier rape joke – basically “You can’t say that!!!”
    But she’s not really able to formulate a precise objection. When the “oppression” thing comes up, she latches on to that and starts to blabber about how rape jokes are somehow “oppressive.”

    It’s not really that, of course. She’s trying to enforce a taboo – one that is semi-sacred to her secular “religion.” To her, it’s “blasphemy” to joke about rape. But she is unable to express that simple concept, because she does not recognize the quasi-religious, faith-based nature of her belief system. So she tries to jam her objection into the “oppressor-victim” model, claiming that every woman in the world is somehow “oppressed” when any man, anywhere jokes about rape.

    Are Christians “oppressed” when someone makes a blasphemous joke about their religion?

    Sargon is obviously correct in claiming that feminism is based on a variant of the simplistic oppressor-victim type of narrative that we see in so much of modern media propaganda and education in the current year.

    But there’s another useful way to understand feminism:

    As Heartiste would put it:

    “The goal of feminism is to remove all constraints on female sexuality while maximally restricting male sexuality.”

    It’s pretty obvious when you think about it.

  10. CH’s mind has been ruined by MPC and he clings to his 5D chess delusions.

    Sad to see such a bright mind swindled by the Q anon crap.

Join the discussion TGKBBS

18 more replies

Participants