American Psychological Association Says Being Male Limits Males

Pomidor Quixote
Daily Stormer
January 11, 2019

If psychologists are effective then why is everywhere plagued with degenerates?

Trick question.

Psychologists produce them.

NBC News:

For the first time in its 127-year history, the American Psychological Association has issued guidelines to help psychologists specifically address the issues of men and boys — and the 36-page document features a warning.

Traditional masculinity ideology has been shown to limit males’ psychological development, constrain their behavior, result in gender role strain and gender role conflict and negatively influence mental health and physical health,” the report warns.

36 pages in 127 years. Pretty efficient.

Translation of their warning: “The uncorrupted manifestations of masculine energy provides boundaries that keep men from degeneracy and that obviously limits them because borders are racist and boundaries are oppressive.”

The new “Guidelines for the Psychological Practice with Boys and Men” defines “masculinity ideology” as “a particular constellation of standards that have held sway over large segments of the population, including: anti-femininity, achievement, eschewal of the appearance of weakness, and adventure, risk, and violence.” The report also links this ideology to homophobia, bullying and sexual harassment.

Anti-femininity… in males, not in women. These psychologist hand rubbers are saying achievement, adventure, taking risks, and not being a passive faggot, somehow are bad for men, while also saying that weakness should not be shunned. It totally should. Not shunning weakness is dysgenic. Everyone should always be getting stronger, in as many ways as they can think of, or working towards that goal.

Violence is not intrinsically bad. Think of violence as a gun. It’s a tool. Sometimes you have to use that tool, and when that time comes, you better know how. Your life and your people’s lives may depend on it.

The new guidelines, highlighted in this month’s issue of Monitor on Psychology, which is published by the APA, linked this ideology to a series of stark statistics: Men commit approximately 90 percent of all homicides in the U.S., they are far more likely than women to be arrested and charged with intimate partner violence in the U.S., and they are four times more likely than women to die of suicide worldwide.

Men commit the most crime for the same reason men commit the most anything. Men do. That’s what we do.

Masculine energy has to be channeled and exercised to prevent the atrophy that may eventually corrupt it. The things most people associate with men and complain about are corrupted manifestations of their original form, of the original male drive. They’re perversions that exist for the same reasons decay does.

Modernity encourages people to stillness, and inaction is antithetical to creation. The result of men asphyxiating the creative flame they carry inside is a whole lot of rottenness.

You have to search for and feel the warmth of your inner flame. It will keep you away from the fallen.

You still have it inside of you.

Use it.

Increase it.

Make it burn.

Jared Skillings, a psychologist and the APA’s chief of professional practice, told NBC News these new guidelines are intended to educate mental health professionals about the unique issues facing this patient population. The APA published a similar report about girls and women in 2007 and is expected to publish an updated version this year.

Masculinity ideology,” Skillings said, was important to highlight because it “represents a set of characteristics that are unhealthy for men — men who are sexist or violent or don’t take care of themselves.”

See what he did there? Notice the gradient.

From “less likely to agree it’s bad” to “most likely to agree it’s bad.” It’s an old trick. People say “something bad, some other bad thing, or worse,” they don’t say “something bad, something meh, or less worse”

By putting something most people can agree it’s bad at the end (not taking care of oneself) they instantly portray the previous enumerated items as bad things too. Sexism is obviously good and violence is just a tool, but now they’re framed as things that are very bad for you.

They do this speech-programming shit all the time.

The report addresses the “power” and “privilege” that males have when compared to their female counterparts, but it notes that this privilege can be a psychological double-edged sword.

Men who benefit from their social power are also confined by system-level policies and practices as well as individual-level psychological resources necessary to maintain male privilege,” the guidelines state. “Thus, male privilege often comes with a cost in the form of adherence to sexist ideologies designed to maintain male power that also restrict men’s ability to function adaptively.”

“Male privilege gives men power but makes them less able to adapt to being globohomos.”

The guidelines for psychologists outlined in the report include encouraging them to “recognize that masculinities are constructed based on social, cultural, and contextual norms“; “understand the impact of power, privilege, and sexism on the development of boys and men and on their relationships with others”; and “reduce the high rates of problems boys and men face and act out in their lives such as aggression, violence, substance abuse, and suicide.”

Believing that races don’t exist or that they do but only affect skin color while being incapable of questioning that belief is one of the pillars of the “social construct” meme. Social constructs are genetic constructs. Society is a consequence of genes.

Gene expression is not merely cosmetic.

If masculinity is so bad and limits men so much, how come we’ve built this great beautiful civilization with all its wonders?

How come we’ve created the most powerful countries?

Have any of these clean-room fetishists ever helped anyone?

I’m not talking about helping people accept their slave status with a cookie-cutter “life is suffering!” speech.

I’m talking about really helping people. Helping them break free of the chains that have been programmed onto them. Breaking free of purposelessness and anomie. Strengthening them. Turning them into warriors and conquerors, not “life is suffering!” masochists.

Has any psychologist ever done that? Because that’s what Mr. Anglin is doing.

Stop giving money to psychologists.

Wouldn’t you rather have a chat with Mr. Anglin?

This Mikhaila Peterson slut charges hundreds of dollars for “consultations” where she tells people “lol I eat steak tehee” and receives Patreon bucks while Mr. Anglin — who actually does something good for the world — has to constantly remind readers he doesn’t have a magic money-shitting anus so the whole thing doesn’t fall apart.

I ask you, then, would  you like Mr. Anglin to offer consultations?

He’d charge way more than the Peterson slut, that’s for sure, because he’d be using his consultations-time one-on-one instead of writing for his entire audience and he’s incomparably more valuable than her, but it would offer people the chance to receive more calibrated advise for their individual cases. I mean, even if you don’t really need help with anything, wouldn’t you pay for having the opportunity to discuss interesting topics with someone who’s on the level?

Independently of that… you should commit to a yearly minimum donation of a hundred bucks. More, ideally.

This war is not going to fight itself.